Plant genetic identity of foundation tree species and their hybrids affects a litter-dwelling generalist predator.
Identifieur interne : 002104 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002103; suivant : 002105Plant genetic identity of foundation tree species and their hybrids affects a litter-dwelling generalist predator.
Auteurs : Todd Wojtowicz [États-Unis] ; Zacchaeus G. Compson ; Louis J. Lamit ; Thomas G. Whitham ; Catherine A. GehringSource :
- Oecologia [ 1432-1939 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Animaux (MeSH), Araignées (physiologie), Arbres (croissance et développement), Arbres (génétique), Comportement prédateur (MeSH), Densité de population (MeSH), Génotype (MeSH), Hybridation génétique (MeSH), Populus (croissance et développement), Populus (génétique), Répartition aléatoire (MeSH), Spécificité d'espèce (MeSH), Utah (MeSH).
- MESH :
- croissance et développement : Arbres, Populus.
- génétique : Arbres, Populus.
- physiologie : Araignées.
- Animaux, Comportement prédateur, Densité de population, Génotype, Hybridation génétique, Répartition aléatoire, Spécificité d'espèce, Utah.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Animals (MeSH), Genotype (MeSH), Hybridization, Genetic (MeSH), Population Density (MeSH), Populus (genetics), Populus (growth & development), Predatory Behavior (MeSH), Random Allocation (MeSH), Species Specificity (MeSH), Spiders (physiology), Trees (genetics), Trees (growth & development), Utah (MeSH).
- MESH :
- genetics : Populus, Trees.
- growth & development : Populus, Trees.
- physiology : Spiders.
- Animals, Genotype, Hybridization, Genetic, Population Density, Predatory Behavior, Random Allocation, Species Specificity, Utah.
Abstract
The effects of plant genetics on predators, especially those not living on the plant itself, are rarely studied and poorly understood. Therefore, we investigated the effect of plant hybridization and genotype on litter-dwelling spiders. Using an 18-year-old cottonwood common garden, we recorded agelenid sheet-web density associated with the litter layers of replicated genotypes of three tree cross types: Populus fremontii, Populus angustifolia, and their F1 hybrids. We surveyed 118 trees for agelenid litter webs at two distances from the trees (0-100 and 100-200 cm from trunk) and measured litter depth as a potential mechanism of web density patterns. Five major results emerged: web density within a 1-m radius of P. angustifolia was approximately three times higher than within a 1-m radius of P. fremontii, with F1 hybrids having intermediate densities; web density responded to P. angustifolia and F1 hybrid genotypes as indicated by a significant genotype × distance interaction, with some genotypes exhibiting a strong decline in web density with distance, while others did not; P. angustifolia litter layers were deeper than those of P. fremontii at both distance classes, and litter depth among P. angustifolia genotypes differed up to 300%; cross type and genotype influenced web density via their effects on litter depth, and these effects were influenced by distance; web density was more sensitive to the effects of tree cross type than genotype. By influencing generalist predators, plant hybridization and genotype may indirectly impact trophic interactions such as intraguild predation, possibly affecting trophic cascades and ecosystem processes.
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-2998-3
PubMed: 25205028
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Plant genetic identity of foundation tree species and their hybrids affects a litter-dwelling generalist predator.</title><author><name sortKey="Wojtowicz, Todd" sort="Wojtowicz, Todd" uniqKey="Wojtowicz T" first="Todd" last="Wojtowicz">Todd Wojtowicz</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5640, USA, tw5@nau.edu.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5640, USA</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>USA</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Compson, Zacchaeus G" sort="Compson, Zacchaeus G" uniqKey="Compson Z" first="Zacchaeus G" last="Compson">Zacchaeus G. Compson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lamit, Louis J" sort="Lamit, Louis J" uniqKey="Lamit L" first="Louis J" last="Lamit">Louis J. Lamit</name></author><author><name sortKey="Whitham, Thomas G" sort="Whitham, Thomas G" uniqKey="Whitham T" first="Thomas G" last="Whitham">Thomas G. Whitham</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gehring, Catherine A" sort="Gehring, Catherine A" uniqKey="Gehring C" first="Catherine A" last="Gehring">Catherine A. Gehring</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25205028</idno><idno type="pmid">25205028</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00442-014-2998-3</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002016</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002016</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002016</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002016</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002016</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Plant genetic identity of foundation tree species and their hybrids affects a litter-dwelling generalist predator.</title><author><name sortKey="Wojtowicz, Todd" sort="Wojtowicz, Todd" uniqKey="Wojtowicz T" first="Todd" last="Wojtowicz">Todd Wojtowicz</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5640, USA, tw5@nau.edu.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5640, USA</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>USA</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Compson, Zacchaeus G" sort="Compson, Zacchaeus G" uniqKey="Compson Z" first="Zacchaeus G" last="Compson">Zacchaeus G. Compson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lamit, Louis J" sort="Lamit, Louis J" uniqKey="Lamit L" first="Louis J" last="Lamit">Louis J. Lamit</name></author><author><name sortKey="Whitham, Thomas G" sort="Whitham, Thomas G" uniqKey="Whitham T" first="Thomas G" last="Whitham">Thomas G. Whitham</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gehring, Catherine A" sort="Gehring, Catherine A" uniqKey="Gehring C" first="Catherine A" last="Gehring">Catherine A. Gehring</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Oecologia</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1939</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals (MeSH)</term><term>Genotype (MeSH)</term><term>Hybridization, Genetic (MeSH)</term><term>Population Density (MeSH)</term><term>Populus (genetics)</term><term>Populus (growth & development)</term><term>Predatory Behavior (MeSH)</term><term>Random Allocation (MeSH)</term><term>Species Specificity (MeSH)</term><term>Spiders (physiology)</term><term>Trees (genetics)</term><term>Trees (growth & development)</term><term>Utah (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Animaux (MeSH)</term><term>Araignées (physiologie)</term><term>Arbres (croissance et développement)</term><term>Arbres (génétique)</term><term>Comportement prédateur (MeSH)</term><term>Densité de population (MeSH)</term><term>Génotype (MeSH)</term><term>Hybridation génétique (MeSH)</term><term>Populus (croissance et développement)</term><term>Populus (génétique)</term><term>Répartition aléatoire (MeSH)</term><term>Spécificité d'espèce (MeSH)</term><term>Utah (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="croissance et développement" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arbres</term><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Populus</term><term>Trees</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Populus</term><term>Trees</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="génétique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arbres</term><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Araignées</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Spiders</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Genotype</term><term>Hybridization, Genetic</term><term>Population Density</term><term>Predatory Behavior</term><term>Random Allocation</term><term>Species Specificity</term><term>Utah</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Animaux</term><term>Comportement prédateur</term><term>Densité de population</term><term>Génotype</term><term>Hybridation génétique</term><term>Répartition aléatoire</term><term>Spécificité d'espèce</term><term>Utah</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The effects of plant genetics on predators, especially those not living on the plant itself, are rarely studied and poorly understood. Therefore, we investigated the effect of plant hybridization and genotype on litter-dwelling spiders. Using an 18-year-old cottonwood common garden, we recorded agelenid sheet-web density associated with the litter layers of replicated genotypes of three tree cross types: Populus fremontii, Populus angustifolia, and their F1 hybrids. We surveyed 118 trees for agelenid litter webs at two distances from the trees (0-100 and 100-200 cm from trunk) and measured litter depth as a potential mechanism of web density patterns. Five major results emerged: web density within a 1-m radius of P. angustifolia was approximately three times higher than within a 1-m radius of P. fremontii, with F1 hybrids having intermediate densities; web density responded to P. angustifolia and F1 hybrid genotypes as indicated by a significant genotype × distance interaction, with some genotypes exhibiting a strong decline in web density with distance, while others did not; P. angustifolia litter layers were deeper than those of P. fremontii at both distance classes, and litter depth among P. angustifolia genotypes differed up to 300%; cross type and genotype influenced web density via their effects on litter depth, and these effects were influenced by distance; web density was more sensitive to the effects of tree cross type than genotype. By influencing generalist predators, plant hybridization and genotype may indirectly impact trophic interactions such as intraguild predation, possibly affecting trophic cascades and ecosystem processes.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" IndexingMethod="Curated" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25205028</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>30</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>02</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1939</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>176</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Nov</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Oecologia</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Oecologia</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Plant genetic identity of foundation tree species and their hybrids affects a litter-dwelling generalist predator.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>799-810</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00442-014-2998-3</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The effects of plant genetics on predators, especially those not living on the plant itself, are rarely studied and poorly understood. Therefore, we investigated the effect of plant hybridization and genotype on litter-dwelling spiders. Using an 18-year-old cottonwood common garden, we recorded agelenid sheet-web density associated with the litter layers of replicated genotypes of three tree cross types: Populus fremontii, Populus angustifolia, and their F1 hybrids. We surveyed 118 trees for agelenid litter webs at two distances from the trees (0-100 and 100-200 cm from trunk) and measured litter depth as a potential mechanism of web density patterns. Five major results emerged: web density within a 1-m radius of P. angustifolia was approximately three times higher than within a 1-m radius of P. fremontii, with F1 hybrids having intermediate densities; web density responded to P. angustifolia and F1 hybrid genotypes as indicated by a significant genotype × distance interaction, with some genotypes exhibiting a strong decline in web density with distance, while others did not; P. angustifolia litter layers were deeper than those of P. fremontii at both distance classes, and litter depth among P. angustifolia genotypes differed up to 300%; cross type and genotype influenced web density via their effects on litter depth, and these effects were influenced by distance; web density was more sensitive to the effects of tree cross type than genotype. By influencing generalist predators, plant hybridization and genotype may indirectly impact trophic interactions such as intraguild predation, possibly affecting trophic cascades and ecosystem processes.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wojtowicz</LastName><ForeName>Todd</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5640, USA, tw5@nau.edu.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Compson</LastName><ForeName>Zacchaeus G</ForeName><Initials>ZG</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lamit</LastName><ForeName>Louis J</ForeName><Initials>LJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Whitham</LastName><ForeName>Thomas G</ForeName><Initials>TG</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gehring</LastName><ForeName>Catherine A</ForeName><Initials>CA</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>11</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Oecologia</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0150372</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0029-8549</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005838" MajorTopicYN="N">Genotype</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006824" MajorTopicYN="N">Hybridization, Genetic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011156" MajorTopicYN="N">Population Density</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011235" MajorTopicYN="Y">Predatory Behavior</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011897" MajorTopicYN="N">Random Allocation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013045" MajorTopicYN="N">Species Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013112" MajorTopicYN="N">Spiders</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="N">Trees</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014589" MajorTopicYN="N">Utah</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>27</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>09</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25205028</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00442-014-2998-3</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 2010 Dec;164(4):899-910</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20859749</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 May 12;366(1569):1329-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21444307</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecol Appl. 2009 Mar;19(2):398-412</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19323198</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tree Physiol. 2009 Sep;29(9):1133-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19578030</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Jun;9(6):209-14</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21236824</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2007 Dec;16(23):5057-69</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17927708</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2010 Nov;91(11):3398-406</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21141200</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1982 Oct;55(1):34-41</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28309899</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecol Lett. 2008 Dec;11(12):1328-37</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19046361</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1133:87-125</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18559817</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1993 Dec;96(3):439-449</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28313662</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2008 Mar;89(3):773-81</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18459340</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Plant Sci. 2012 May;17(5):271-81</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22322002</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2006 Jan;87(1):255-61</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16634316</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Conserv Biol. 2009 Oct;23(5):1146-55</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19459892</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 2000 Apr;123(1):99-107</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28308750</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 2005 Jan;59(1):61-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15792227</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ecology. 2010 Apr;91(4):1237-43</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20462137</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 2004 Sep;58(9):2100-2</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15521465</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2006 Apr;15(5):1379-91</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16626460</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2006 Nov;15(13):4215-28</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17054514</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1989 Dec;81(4):459-464</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28312637</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 May 12;366(1569):1453-60</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21444318</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1979 Jan;40(1):29-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28309601</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28061</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22132211</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 2001 Jul;55(7):1325-35</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11525457</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 2006 Aug;149(2):265-75</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16708227</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 1996 Jan;105(2):258-265</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28307091</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Compson, Zacchaeus G" sort="Compson, Zacchaeus G" uniqKey="Compson Z" first="Zacchaeus G" last="Compson">Zacchaeus G. Compson</name><name sortKey="Gehring, Catherine A" sort="Gehring, Catherine A" uniqKey="Gehring C" first="Catherine A" last="Gehring">Catherine A. Gehring</name><name sortKey="Lamit, Louis J" sort="Lamit, Louis J" uniqKey="Lamit L" first="Louis J" last="Lamit">Louis J. Lamit</name><name sortKey="Whitham, Thomas G" sort="Whitham, Thomas G" uniqKey="Whitham T" first="Thomas G" last="Whitham">Thomas G. Whitham</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><noRegion><name sortKey="Wojtowicz, Todd" sort="Wojtowicz, Todd" uniqKey="Wojtowicz T" first="Todd" last="Wojtowicz">Todd Wojtowicz</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002104 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002104 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25205028
|texte= Plant genetic identity of foundation tree species and their hybrids affects a litter-dwelling generalist predator.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25205028" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |